Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs GPT-5.5 Pro and Claude Opus 4.1
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) costs $30/1M input, $150/1M output with 1M context. Compare token pricing and quality against GPT-5.5 Pro and older Claude models.
Published
TL;DR
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) matches GPT-5.5 Pro on input costs but costs $30 per million tokens less on output, while offering a full 1M context window. It's the better value for high-volume output workloads, though quality scores are comparable.
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) vs. alternatives — live pricing
| Model | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) | $30.00 | $150 | 1M | 77 |
| Claude Opus 4.7 (Fast) | $30.00 | $150 | 1M | 76 |
| Claude Opus 4.1 | $15.00 | $75.00 | 200K | 77 |
| GPT-5.5 Pro | $30.00 | $180 | 1.1M | 72 |
| GPT-5.4 Pro | $30.00 | $180 | 1.1M | — |
Primary sources
- OpenRouter — live model pricing — Input/output price per token and context length
- LMArena leaderboard — Crowd-sourced Elo, normalised to a 0–100 quality score
- TokenRate price comparison tool
Frequently Asked Questions
How much will I save on output tokens using Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) instead of GPT-5.5 Pro?
Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) saves $30 per million output tokens compared to GPT-5.5 Pro. For a workload generating 100 million output tokens monthly, that translates to $3,000 in savings. The calculation: (180 - 150) × (output tokens / 1,000,000).
Should I downgrade to Claude Opus 4.1 to cut costs in half?
Only if your use case fits within a 200K context window. Claude Opus 4.1's 75 percent input and output cost reduction is offset by its inability to handle long documents or sustained conversations. For most production workloads requiring context, Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) offers better total value despite higher per-token pricing.
Is Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast) slower than the standard version?
The Fast designation indicates this model prioritizes throughput and cost over lowest latency. If your application requires sub-second response times, a standard variant may be preferable. For batch processing, async workflows, and non-real-time use cases, the speed difference is negligible and the cost savings are substantial.
Why is the context window important for my token bill?
Larger context windows reduce the number of API calls needed by processing more data per request. Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast)'s 1M context avoids expensive re-indexing and chunking overhead, lowering total input costs even at higher per-token rates. This advantage compounds for document-heavy or multi-turn workflows.
Try the TokenRate Calculator
Use the TokenRate calculator to model your specific input and output volumes against Claude Opus 4.6 (Fast), GPT-5.5 Pro, and other models to see exact monthly costs for your workload.
Open Calculator →Related Reading