TokenRate

Claude Opus 4 vs OpenAI o3

Compare the two most powerful AI models from Anthropic and OpenAI — Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI o3 — on price, reasoning, and real-world tasks.

Comparing 2 models · Prices last verified

Verdict

Both are flagship-tier models. o3 has an edge on math/science benchmarks via chain-of-thought reasoning. Claude Opus 4 excels at nuanced writing, instruction-following, and longer context utilization. o3 input is cheaper ($10 vs $15/1M) but output costs less ($40 vs $75/1M).

Pricing Comparison

ModelProviderInput / 1MOutput / 1MContextTier
Claude Opus 4Anthropic$15.00$75.00200Kflagship
OpenAI o3OpenAI$10.00$40.00200Kreasoning

Model Breakdown

Claude Opus 4

Anthropic

$15.00

per 1M input

Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most powerful model — built for complex reasoning, long-form analysis, and tasks that require deep context understanding. It excels at nuanced writing, research synthesis, and multi-step problem solving.

Best-in-class reasoning and analysis
Excellent at nuanced, long-form writing
OpenAI o3

OpenAI

$10.00

per 1M input

OpenAI o3 is a frontier reasoning model that thinks step-by-step before answering. It significantly outperforms previous models on math, science, and complex coding tasks — but at a higher cost due to extended chain-of-thought processing.

State-of-the-art on math, science, and coding benchmarks
Extended chain-of-thought reasoning

Our Verdict

Both are flagship-tier models. o3 has an edge on math/science benchmarks via chain-of-thought reasoning. Claude Opus 4 excels at nuanced writing, instruction-following, and longer context utilization. o3 input is cheaper ($10 vs $15/1M) but output costs less ($40 vs $75/1M).

FAQ

Compare These Models Yourself

Use the TokenRate calculator to enter your budget or token count and see the exact cost for each model side by side.

Open Calculator →

More Comparisons