Claude Opus 4 vs OpenAI o3
Compare the two most powerful AI models from Anthropic and OpenAI — Claude Opus 4 and OpenAI o3 — on price, reasoning, and real-world tasks.
Comparing 2 models · Prices last verified
Verdict
Both are flagship-tier models. o3 has an edge on math/science benchmarks via chain-of-thought reasoning. Claude Opus 4 excels at nuanced writing, instruction-following, and longer context utilization. o3 input is cheaper ($10 vs $15/1M) but output costs less ($40 vs $75/1M).
Pricing Comparison
| Model | Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 4 | Anthropic | $15.00 | $75.00 | 200K | flagship |
| OpenAI o3 | OpenAI | $10.00 | $40.00 | 200K | reasoning |
Model Breakdown
Anthropic
$15.00
per 1M input
Claude Opus 4 is Anthropic's most powerful model — built for complex reasoning, long-form analysis, and tasks that require deep context understanding. It excels at nuanced writing, research synthesis, and multi-step problem solving.
OpenAI
$10.00
per 1M input
OpenAI o3 is a frontier reasoning model that thinks step-by-step before answering. It significantly outperforms previous models on math, science, and complex coding tasks — but at a higher cost due to extended chain-of-thought processing.
Our Verdict
Both are flagship-tier models. o3 has an edge on math/science benchmarks via chain-of-thought reasoning. Claude Opus 4 excels at nuanced writing, instruction-following, and longer context utilization. o3 input is cheaper ($10 vs $15/1M) but output costs less ($40 vs $75/1M).
FAQ
Compare These Models Yourself
Use the TokenRate calculator to enter your budget or token count and see the exact cost for each model side by side.
Open Calculator →More Comparisons