TokenRate

GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4

Side-by-side comparison of GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 4 on pricing, context length, strengths, and best use cases.

Comparing 2 models · Prices last verified

Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4 is slightly cheaper on input ($3 vs $2.50/1M, where GPT-4o wins on input cost) but both are close in quality. GPT-4o wins on multimodal tasks (native image/audio); Claude Sonnet 4 wins on nuanced long-form writing and 200K vs 128K context.

Pricing Comparison

ModelProviderInput / 1MOutput / 1MContextTier
GPT-4oOpenAI$2.50$10.00128Kbalanced
Claude Sonnet 4Anthropic$3.00$15.00200Kbalanced

Model Breakdown

GPT-4o

OpenAI

$2.50

per 1M input

GPT-4o is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model — capable of processing text, images, and audio. It's the default choice for most production OpenAI workloads, balancing cost, speed, and capability.

Native multimodal: text, image, and audio
Strong coding and reasoning performance

$3.00

per 1M input

Claude Sonnet 4 is the sweet spot in Anthropic's lineup — fast, affordable, and capable enough for the vast majority of production workloads. It delivers near-Opus quality at a fraction of the cost.

Excellent quality-to-price ratio
Fast response times suitable for production apps

Our Verdict

Claude Sonnet 4 is slightly cheaper on input ($3 vs $2.50/1M, where GPT-4o wins on input cost) but both are close in quality. GPT-4o wins on multimodal tasks (native image/audio); Claude Sonnet 4 wins on nuanced long-form writing and 200K vs 128K context.

FAQ

Compare These Models Yourself

Use the TokenRate calculator to enter your budget or token count and see the exact cost for each model side by side.

Open Calculator →

More Comparisons