GPT-4o vs Claude Sonnet 4
Side-by-side comparison of GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 4 on pricing, context length, strengths, and best use cases.
Comparing 2 models · Prices last verified
Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4 is slightly cheaper on input ($3 vs $2.50/1M, where GPT-4o wins on input cost) but both are close in quality. GPT-4o wins on multimodal tasks (native image/audio); Claude Sonnet 4 wins on nuanced long-form writing and 200K vs 128K context.
Pricing Comparison
| Model | Provider | Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Context | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o | OpenAI | $2.50 | $10.00 | 128K | balanced |
| Claude Sonnet 4 | Anthropic | $3.00 | $15.00 | 200K | balanced |
Model Breakdown
OpenAI
$2.50
per 1M input
GPT-4o is OpenAI's flagship multimodal model — capable of processing text, images, and audio. It's the default choice for most production OpenAI workloads, balancing cost, speed, and capability.
Anthropic
$3.00
per 1M input
Claude Sonnet 4 is the sweet spot in Anthropic's lineup — fast, affordable, and capable enough for the vast majority of production workloads. It delivers near-Opus quality at a fraction of the cost.
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4 is slightly cheaper on input ($3 vs $2.50/1M, where GPT-4o wins on input cost) but both are close in quality. GPT-4o wins on multimodal tasks (native image/audio); Claude Sonnet 4 wins on nuanced long-form writing and 200K vs 128K context.
FAQ
Compare These Models Yourself
Use the TokenRate calculator to enter your budget or token count and see the exact cost for each model side by side.
Open Calculator →More Comparisons